> On Jul 26, 2019, at 10:11 PM, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakry...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:20 PM Song Liu <songliubrav...@fb.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 24, 2019, at 5:37 PM, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakry...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 5:00 PM Song Liu <songliubrav...@fb.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 24, 2019, at 12:27 PM, Andrii Nakryiko <andr...@fb.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Add support for BPF CO-RE offset relocations. Add section/record
>>>>> iteration macros for .BTF.ext. These macro are useful for iterating over
>>>>> each .BTF.ext record, either for dumping out contents or later for BPF
>>>>> CO-RE relocation handling.
>>>>>
>>>>> To enable other parts of libbpf to work with .BTF.ext contents, moved
>>>>> a bunch of type definitions into libbpf_internal.h.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andr...@fb.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 64 +++++++++--------------
>>>>> tools/lib/bpf/btf.h | 4 ++
>>>>> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 3 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> static int btf_ext_parse_hdr(__u8 *data, __u32 data_size)
>>>>> {
>>>>> const struct btf_ext_header *hdr = (struct btf_ext_header *)data;
>>>>> @@ -1004,6 +979,13 @@ struct btf_ext *btf_ext__new(__u8 *data, __u32 size)
>>>>> if (err)
>>>>> goto done;
>>>>>
>>>>> + /* check if there is offset_reloc_off/offset_reloc_len fields */
>>>>> + if (btf_ext->hdr->hdr_len < sizeof(struct btf_ext_header))
>>>>
>>>> This check will break when we add more optional sections to btf_ext_header.
>>>> Maybe use offsetof() instead?
>>>
>>> I didn't do it, because there are no fields after offset_reloc_len.
>>> But now I though that maybe it would be ok to add zero-sized marker
>>> field, kind of like marking off various versions of btf_ext header?
>>>
>>> Alternatively, I can add offsetofend() macro somewhere in libbpf_internal.h.
>>>
>>> Do you have any preference?
>>
>> We only need a stable number to compare against. offsetofend() works.
>> Or we can simply have something like
>>
>> if (btf_ext->hdr->hdr_len <= offsetof(struct btf_ext_header,
>> offset_reloc_off))
>> goto done;
>> or
>> if (btf_ext->hdr->hdr_len < offsetof(struct btf_ext_header,
>> offset_reloc_len))
>> goto done;
>>
>> Does this make sense?
>
> I think offsetofend() is the cleanest solution, I'll do just that.
Agreed that offsetofend() is the best.
Song
