On 7/26/19 11:25 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>>> + } else if (class == BPF_ST && BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_MEM) {
>>> + if (insn->imm != orig_off)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + insn->imm = new_off;
>>> + pr_debug("prog '%s': patched insn #%d (ST | MEM) imm %d ->
>>> %d\n",
>>> + bpf_program__title(prog, false),
>>> + insn_idx, orig_off, new_off);
>> I'm pretty sure llvm was not capable of emitting BPF_ST insn.
>> When did that change?
> I just looked at possible instructions that could have 32-bit
> immediate value. This is `*(rX) = offsetof(struct s, field)`, which I
> though is conceivable. Do you think I should drop it?
Just trying to point out that since it's not emitted by llvm
this code is likely untested ?
Or you've created a bpf asm test for this?
