From: Maor Gottlieb <ma...@mellanox.com>

New flow table type RDMA_RX was added but the MLX5_CAP_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE
didn't handle this new flow table type.
This means that MLX5_CAP_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE returns an empty capability to
this flow table type.

Update both the macro and the maximum supported flow table type to
RDMA_RX.

Fixes: d83eb50e29de ("net/mlx5: Add support in RDMA RX steering")
Signed-off-by: Maor Gottlieb <ma...@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <sae...@mellanox.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.h | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.h 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.h
index c48c382f926f..c1252d6be0ef 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.h
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ enum fs_flow_table_type {
        FS_FT_SNIFFER_RX        = 0X5,
        FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX        = 0X6,
        FS_FT_RDMA_RX           = 0X7,
-       FS_FT_MAX_TYPE = FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX,
+       FS_FT_MAX_TYPE = FS_FT_RDMA_RX,
 };
 
 enum fs_flow_table_op_mod {
@@ -275,7 +275,8 @@ void mlx5_cleanup_fs(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev);
        (type == FS_FT_FDB) ? MLX5_CAP_ESW_FLOWTABLE_FDB(mdev, cap) :           
\
        (type == FS_FT_SNIFFER_RX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_SNIFFER_RX(mdev, cap) : 
        \
        (type == FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_SNIFFER_TX(mdev, cap) : 
        \
-       (BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX != FS_FT_MAX_TYPE))\
+       (type == FS_FT_RDMA_RX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_RDMA_RX(mdev, cap) :       
        \
+       (BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(FS_FT_RDMA_RX != FS_FT_MAX_TYPE))\
        )
 
 #endif
-- 
2.21.0

Reply via email to