Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 08:31:30PM CEST, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
>From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>
>
>The timer and work item are currently initialized once during module
>init, but subsequent patches will need to associate different functions
>with the work item, based on the configured alert mode.
>
>Allow subsequent patches to make that change by initializing and
>de-initializing these objects during tracing enable and disable.
>
>This also guarantees that once the request to disable tracing returns,
>no more netlink notifications will be generated.
>
>Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>
>---
> net/core/drop_monitor.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/core/drop_monitor.c b/net/core/drop_monitor.c
>index e68dafaaebcd..2f56a61c43c6 100644
>--- a/net/core/drop_monitor.c
>+++ b/net/core/drop_monitor.c
>@@ -257,13 +257,20 @@ static void trace_napi_poll_hit(void *ignore, struct 
>napi_struct *napi,
> 
> static int net_dm_trace_on_set(struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
>-      int rc;
>+      int cpu, rc;
> 
>       if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE)) {
>               NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to take reference on 
> module");
>               return -ENODEV;
>       }
> 
>+      for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>+              struct per_cpu_dm_data *data = &per_cpu(dm_cpu_data, cpu);
>+
>+              INIT_WORK(&data->dm_alert_work, send_dm_alert);
>+              timer_setup(&data->send_timer, sched_send_work, 0);

So don't you want to remove this initialization from
init_net_drop_monitor?


>+      }
>+
>       rc = register_trace_kfree_skb(trace_kfree_skb_hit, NULL);
>       if (rc) {
>               NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to connect probe to 
> kfree_skb() tracepoint");

[...]

Reply via email to