The issue is resolved by enabling vlan_filtering for the bridge and fix the phy-mode to "rgmii" from "rgmii-txid" in the dts file.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 6:57 PM Anand Raj Manickam <anan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi , > I had working DSA with 4.9.184 kernel, with BCM53125, rev 4 hardware . > It had 2 bridges with > br0 8000.00 no lan1 > lan2 > lan3 > eth0.101 > > br1 8000.01 no eth0.102 > wan > # bridge vlan > port vlan ids > wan 102 PVID Egress Untagged > wan 102 PVID Egress Untagged > lan3 101 PVID Egress Untagged > lan3 101 PVID Egress Untagged > lan2 101 PVID Egress Untagged > lan2 101 PVID Egress Untagged > lan1 101 PVID Egress Untagged > lan1 101 PVID Egress Untagged > eth0.102 102 PVID > eth0.102 > br1 1 PVID Egress Untagged > eth0.101 101 PVID > eth0.101 > br0 1 PVID Egress Untagged > > I upgrade the kernel to 5.2 . The behavior is broken. I had to rip the > config and check what was broken from the init scripts. > the bridge vlan commands failed to add , as the newer kernel requires > the vlan interfaces to be up . > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/22/887 - i had the same behaviour as this > thread . > I re added them manually , so the we have the same bridge to vlan > mapping as the previous kernel . > but the ingress packets for WAN where going to LAN(bridge) and the > egress packets where on WAN(bridge) but the packets never leaves the > interface . > > I test this with a simple config : > ip link add link eth0 name eth0.101 type vlan id 101 > ip link add link eth0 name eth0.102 type vlan id 102 > ip link set eth0.101 up > ip link set eth0.102 up > ip link add br0 type bridge > ip link add br1 type bridge > ip link set lan1 master br1 > ip link set lan2 master br1 > ip link set lan3 master br1 > ip link set wan master br0 > bridge vlan add vid 101 dev lan1 pvid untagged > bridge vlan add vid 101 dev lan2 pvid untagged > bridge vlan add vid 101 dev lan3 pvid untagged > bridge vlan add vid 102 dev wan pvid untagged > bridge vlan del vid 1 dev wan > bridge vlan del vid 1 dev lan1 > bridge vlan del vid 1 dev lan2 > bridge vlan del vid 1 dev lan3 > ip link set eth0.101 master br1 > ip link set eth0.102 master br0 > bridge vlan del vid 1 dev eth0.102 > bridge vlan del vid 1 dev eth0.101 > bridge vlan add vid 102 dev eth0.102 pvid > bridge vlan add vid 101 dev eth0.101 pvid > ifconfig br0 up > ifconfig br1 up > ifconfig wan up > ifconfig lan1 up > ifconfig lan2 up > ifconfig lan3 up > > I donot see any packets with a tag on eth0 > ~# bridge vlan > port vlan ids > wan 102 PVID Egress Untagged > lan3 101 PVID Egress Untagged > lan2 101 PVID Egress Untagged > lan1 101 PVID Egress Untagged > eth0.101 101 PVID > eth0.102 102 PVID > br0 1 PVID Egress Untagged > br1 1 PVID Egress Untagged > > These are the loaded modules: > # lsmod > Module Size Used by > b53_mdio 16384 0 > b53_mmap 16384 0 > b53_common 28672 2 b53_mdio,b53_mmap > tag_8021q 16384 0 > dsa_core 32768 9 b53_mdio,b53_common,b53_mmap,tag_8021q > phylink 20480 2 b53_common,dsa_core > > if i re config > #bridge vlan add vid 102 dev wan pvid untagged > #bridge vlan add vid 102 dev eth0.102 pvid > Then i see the tags for ingress packets . but no packets are > transmitted out on the wire , but the stats in ifconfig show as > transmitted . > # ifconfig br0 > br0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 10.17.33.137 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.17.33.255 > inet6 fe80::3ef8:4aff:fe9c:5a04 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > ether 3c:f8:4a:9c:5a:04 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 616 bytes 32351 (31.5 KiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 679 bytes 30286 (29.5 KiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > #ifconfig eth0 > eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet6 fe80::d6:5ff:fec2:93af prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > ether 02:d6:05:c2:93:af txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 58017 bytes 4004093 (3.8 MiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 4322 bytes 301365 (294.3 KiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > device interrupt 56 > > Can some shed some light on this config . > -Anand
