On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 08:59, Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_TCP || sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (!sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_syncookies)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (!th->syn || th->ack || th->fin || th->rst)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + switch (sk->sk_family) {
>
> This is strange, because a dual stack listener will have sk->sk_family set to
> AF_INET6.
>
> What really matters here is if the packet is IPv4 or IPv6.
>
> So you need to look at iph->version instead.
>
> Then look if the socket family allows this packet to be processed
> (For example AF_INET6 sockets might prevent IPv4 packets, see sk->sk_ipv6only
> )
Does this apply for (the existing) tcp_check_syn_cookie as well?
--
Lorenz Bauer | Systems Engineer
6th Floor, County Hall/The Riverside Building, SE1 7PB, UK
www.cloudflare.com
