From: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 18:49:49 +0200
> Since the SACK receive cache doesn't need the data to be in host
> order we also remove the ntohl in the checking loop.
...
> - for (i = 0; i< num_sacks; i++) {
> - __u32 start_seq = ntohl(sp[i].start_seq);
> - __u32 end_seq = ntohl(sp[i].end_seq);
> + for (i = 0; i < num_sacks; i++) {
> + __u32 start_seq = sp[i].start_seq;
> + __u32 end_seq = sp[i].end_seq;
...
> }
> tp->recv_sack_cache[i].start_seq = start_seq;
> tp->recv_sack_cache[i].end_seq = end_seq;
Ok, and now the sack cache and the real sack blocks are
stored in net-endian and this works out because we only
make direct equality comparisons with the recv_sack_cache[]
entry values?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
