From: Igor Russkikh <igor.russk...@aquantia.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:02:54 +0000

> 
>> 
>>> Devlink has just gained something similar to ethtool -i. Maybe we
>>> should get the devlink core to also report the kernel version?
>> 
>> I don't think we have the driver version at all there, my usual
>> inclination being to not duplicate information across APIs.  Do we 
>> have non-hypothetical instances of users reporting ethtool -i without
>> uname output?  Admittedly I may work with above-average Linux-trained
>> engineers :S  Would it be okay to just get devlink user space to use
>> uname() to get the info?
> 
> I work alot with field support engineering people, they have a 'NIC-centric'
> view on a system and often assume NIC driver version is all that matters.
> 
> Therefore `ethtool -i` is often the only thing we get when debugging user 
> issues.

This is an education issue, not one of what we should be doing in the
kernel.

Reply via email to