On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 08:16:28 -0600
David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/19/19 5:59 PM, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> > If fc_nh_id isn't set, we shouldn't try to match against it. This
> > actually matters just for the RTF_CACHE case below (where this is
> > already handled): if iproute2 gets a route exception and tries to
> > delete it, it won't reference its fc_nh_id, even if a nexthop
> > object might be associated to the originating route.
> >
> > Fixes: 5b98324ebe29 ("ipv6: Allow routes to use nexthop objects")
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbri...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > v6: New patch
> >
> > net/ipv6/route.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
>
> Thanks for catching that.
Your recent addition to pmtu.sh did it :)
--
Stefano
