On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 11:18:38AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > I don't mean it's necessary. I mean now skb is freed > unconditionally and after this patch, if there is some > error in counting, skb will stay. I thought Masayuki > wrote about such possibility, but if I missed his > point, then the rest is really O.K.
OK, I see what you mean. I'm not aware of anybody who has coded in this way. Alexey & Dave, do you know of any place where __kfree_skb is used to free an skb whose ref count is greater than 1? Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
