On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 9:44 AM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leit...@gmail.com> wrote: > I had suggested to let act_ct handle the above as well, as there is a > big chunk of code on both that is pretty similar. There is quite some > boilerplate for interfacing with conntrack which is duplicated.
Why do you want to mix retrieving conntrack info with executing conntrack? They are totally different things to me, act_ctinfo merely retrieves information from conntrack, while this one, act_ct, is supposed to move packets to conntrack.
