On 6/12/19, Michal Kubecek <mkube...@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:33:48PM +0200, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>> in IPoIB case we can't see a VF broadcast address for but
>> can see for PF
>>
>> Before:
>> 11: ib1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 2044 qdisc pfifo_fast
>> state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 256
>>     link/infiniband
>> 80:00:00:66:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:24:8a:07:03:00:a4:3e:7c brd
>> 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>     vf 0 MAC 14:80:00:00:66:fe, spoof checking off, link-state disable,
>> trust off, query_rss off
>> ...
>>
>> After:
>> 11: ib1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 2044 qdisc pfifo_fast
>> state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 256
>>     link/infiniband
>> 80:00:00:66:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:24:8a:07:03:00:a4:3e:7c brd
>> 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>     vf 0     link/infiniband
>> 80:00:00:66:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:24:8a:07:03:00:a4:3e:7c brd
>> 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff, spoof
>> checking off, link-state disable, trust off, query_rss off
>> ...
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <dkirja...@suse.com>
>> ---
>>  net/core/rtnetlink.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>> index 2e1b9ffbe602..f70902b57a40 100644
>> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>> @@ -1248,6 +1248,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int
>> rtnl_fill_vfinfo(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>      if (!vf)
>>              goto nla_put_vfinfo_failure;
>>      if (nla_put(skb, IFLA_VF_MAC, sizeof(vf_mac), &vf_mac) ||
>> +        nla_put(skb, IFLA_BROADCAST, dev->addr_len, dev->broadcast) ||
>>          nla_put(skb, IFLA_VF_VLAN, sizeof(vf_vlan), &vf_vlan) ||
>>          nla_put(skb, IFLA_VF_RATE, sizeof(vf_rate),
>>                  &vf_rate) ||
>
> This doesn't seem right, IFLA_BROADCAST is 2 which is the same as
> IFLA_VF_VLAN. You should add a new constant in the same enum as other
> IFLA_VF_* attribute types expected in this context. You should then also
> add an entry to ifla_vf_policy and account for the new attribute size in
> rtnl_vfinfo_size().

Ah, ok,

Thanks

>
> Michal
>

Reply via email to