> On Jun 6, 2019, at 12:43 PM, Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> On Thu,  6 Jun 2019 10:52:18 -0700
> Vedang Patel <vedang.pa...@intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> @@ -405,6 +420,7 @@ static int taprio_print_opt(struct qdisc_util *qu, FILE 
>> *f, struct rtattr *opt)
>>      struct rtattr *tb[TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_MAX + 1];
>>      struct tc_mqprio_qopt *qopt = 0;
>>      __s32 clockid = CLOCKID_INVALID;
>> +    __u32 offload_flags = 0;
>>      int i;
>> 
>>      if (opt == NULL)
>> @@ -442,6 +458,11 @@ static int taprio_print_opt(struct qdisc_util *qu, FILE 
>> *f, struct rtattr *opt)
>> 
>>      print_string(PRINT_ANY, "clockid", "clockid %s", 
>> get_clock_name(clockid));
>> 
>> +    if (tb[TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_OFFLOAD_FLAGS])
>> +            offload_flags = 
>> rta_getattr_u32(tb[TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_OFFLOAD_FLAGS]);
>> +
>> +    print_uint(PRINT_ANY, "offload", " offload %x", offload_flags);
> 
> I don't think offload flags should be  printed at all if not present.
> 
> Why not?
Will make this in the next version.
>       if (tb[TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_OFFLOLAD_FLAGS]) {
>               __u32 offload_flags = 
> rta_getattr_u32(tb[TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_OFFLOAD_FLAGS]);
> 
>               print_uint(PRINT_ANY, "offload", " offload %x", offload_flags);
>       }

Reply via email to