On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 5:09 PM Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> wrote: > > >> tools/bpf/bpftool/cgroup.c | 5 ++++- > >> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++ > > Should the bpf.h sync to tools/ be in a separate patch? > > I was thinking about it, but concluded for such small change, it's not > really worth it. If there's a strong opinion, I could do it, but I think > that 2-liner sync patch just adds noise.
it's not about the size. It breaks the sync of libbpf. we should really enforce user vs kernel to be separate patches.
