On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 02:05:24PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 02:26:36PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:34:49AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> > > b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> > > index c56ffc61ab1e..8ae4906a60e7 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> > > @@ -1255,7 +1255,11 @@ int ib_register_device(struct ib_device *device,
> > > const char *name)
> > > goto dev_cleanup;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - rdma_counter_init(device);
> > > + ret = rdma_counter_init(device);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_warn(&device->dev, "Couldn't initialize counter\n");
> > > + goto sysfs_cleanup;
> > > + }
> >
> > Don't put this things randomly, if there is some reason it should be
> > after sysfs it needs a comment, otherwise if it is just allocating
> > memory it belongs earlier, and the unwind should be done in release.
> >
> > I also think it is very strange/wrong that both sysfs and counters are
> > allocating the same alloc_hw_stats object
> >
> > Why can't they share?
>
> They can, but we wanted to separate "legacy" counters which were exposed
> through sysfs and "new" counters which can be enabled/disable automatically.
Is there any cross contamination through the hw_stats? If no they
should just share.
Jason
