On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 02:14:43PM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Now that we don't have __rcu markers on the bpf_prog_array helpers,
> let's use proper rcu_dereference_protected to obtain array pointer
> under mutex.
> 
> We also don't need __rcu annotations on cgroup_bpf.inactive since
> it's not read/updated concurrently.
> 
> v4:
> * drop cgroup_rcu_xyz wrappers and use rcu APIs directly; presumably
>   should be more clear to understand which mutex/refcount protects
>   each particular place
> 
> v3:
> * amend cgroup_rcu_dereference to include percpu_ref_is_dying;
>   cgroup_bpf is now reference counted and we don't hold cgroup_mutex
>   anymore in cgroup_bpf_release
> 
> v2:
> * replace xchg with rcu_swap_protected
> 
> Cc: Roman Gushchin <g...@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <s...@google.com>

Yeah, the looks even better.

Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <g...@fb.com>

Thanks!

Reply via email to