On Fri, 24 May 2019 10:08:28 -0600
David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/24/19 2:59 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> > Before the patch:
> > $ ip netns add foo
> > $ ip link add name veth1 address 2a:a5:5c:b9:52:89 type veth peer name
> > veth2 address 2a:a5:5c:b9:53:90 netns foo
> > RTNETLINK answers: No such device
> > RTNETLINK answers: No such device
> >
> > But the command was successful. This may break script. Let's remove those
> > error messages.
> >
> > Fixes: 55870dfe7f8b ("Improve batch and dump times by caching link lookups")
> > Reported-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guib...@6wind.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dich...@6wind.com>
> > ---
> > lib/ll_map.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/ll_map.c b/lib/ll_map.c
> > index 2d7b65dcb8f7..e0ed54bf77c9 100644
> > --- a/lib/ll_map.c
> > +++ b/lib/ll_map.c
> > @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int ll_link_get(const char *name, int index)
> > addattr_l(&req.n, sizeof(req), IFLA_IFNAME, name,
> > strlen(name) + 1);
> >
> > - if (rtnl_talk(&rth, &req.n, &answer) < 0)
> > + if (rtnl_talk_suppress_rtnl_errmsg(&rth, &req.n, &answer) < 0)
> > goto out;
> >
> > /* add entry to cache */
> >
>
> In general, ll_link_get suppressing the error message seems like the
> right thing to do.
>
> For the example above, seems like nl_get_ll_addr_len is the cause of the
> error messages, and it should not be called for this use case (NEWLINK
> with NLM_F_CREATE set)
Agree. I merged the patch to ll_link_get but send another to avoid
the cause of unnecessary query.
