Sun, May 19, 2019 at 05:10:46AM CEST, step...@networkplumber.org wrote:
>When a device is stacked like (team, bonding, failsafe or netvsc) the
>XDP generic program for the parent device is not called. In these
>cases, the rx handler changes skb->dev to its own in the receive
>handler, and returns RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER. Fix this by calling
>do_xdp_generic if necessary before starting another round.
>
>Review of all the places RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER is returned
>show that the current devices do correctly change skb->dev.
>
>There was an older patch that got abandoned that did the
>same thing, this is just a rewrite.
>
>Suggested-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
>Fixes: d445516966dc ("net: xdp: support xdp generic on virtual devices")
>Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com>
>Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
>---
> net/core/dev.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
>index b6b8505cfb3e..240d0b2de1a8 100644
>--- a/net/core/dev.c
>+++ b/net/core/dev.c
>@@ -4921,6 +4921,16 @@ static int __netif_receive_skb_core(struct sk_buff
>*skb, bool pfmemalloc,
> ret = NET_RX_SUCCESS;
> goto out;
> case RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER:
>+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&generic_xdp_needed_key)) {
>+ struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
>+
>+ xdp_prog = rcu_dereference(skb->dev->xdp_prog);
>+ ret = do_xdp_generic(xdp_prog, skb);
>+ if (ret != XDP_PASS) {
>+ ret = NET_RX_SUCCESS;
>+ goto out;
>+ }
>+ }
I'm always scarred of changes like this. The history tells us that this
codepaths are very fragile. It took us non-trivial efford to fix bonding
here, not to mention vlans (that was pain).
The reason for troubles was often fact that different flows were treated
differently (vlan accel/non-accel).
This patch calls do_xdp_generic for master device in different point in
the receive patch comparing to lower device. Would it be possible to
unify this? E.g. by moving do_xdp_generice() call from
netif_rx_internal()/netif_receive_skb_internal() here,
to the beginning of __netif_receive_skb_core()?
> goto another_round;
> case RX_HANDLER_EXACT:
> deliver_exact = true;
>--
>2.20.1
>
