From: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>

[ Upstream commit 0edd6b64d1939e9e9168ff27947995bb7751db5d ]

Unless the very next line is schedule(), or implies it, one must not use
preempt_enable_no_resched(). It can cause a preemption to go missing and
thereby cause arbitrary delays, breaking the PREEMPT=y invariant.

Cc: Roman Gushchin <g...@fb.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 523481a3471b5..fd95f2efe5f32 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ int bpf_prog_array_copy(struct bpf_prog_array __rcu 
*old_array,
                }                                       \
 _out:                                                  \
                rcu_read_unlock();                      \
-               preempt_enable_no_resched();            \
+               preempt_enable();                       \
                _ret;                                   \
         })
 
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to