On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 02:28:00PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> SCTP_CMD_GEN_INIT_ACK was introduced since very beginning, but never
> got used. So remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien....@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/net/sctp/command.h | 1 -
> net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 11 -----------
> 2 files changed, 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/command.h b/include/net/sctp/command.h
> index 6d5beac..b4e8706 100644
> --- a/include/net/sctp/command.h
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/command.h
> @@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ enum sctp_verb {
> SCTP_CMD_REPORT_TSN, /* Record the arrival of a TSN. */
> SCTP_CMD_GEN_SACK, /* Send a Selective ACK (maybe). */
> SCTP_CMD_PROCESS_SACK, /* Process an inbound SACK. */
> - SCTP_CMD_GEN_INIT_ACK, /* Generate an INIT ACK chunk. */
> SCTP_CMD_PEER_INIT, /* Process a INIT from the peer. */
> SCTP_CMD_GEN_COOKIE_ECHO, /* Generate a COOKIE ECHO chunk. */
> SCTP_CMD_CHUNK_ULP, /* Send a chunk to the sockets layer. */
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> index 4aa0358..233ee80 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> @@ -1364,17 +1364,6 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(enum sctp_event_type
> event_type,
> cmd->obj.chunk);
> break;
>
> - case SCTP_CMD_GEN_INIT_ACK:
> - /* Generate an INIT ACK chunk. */
> - new_obj = sctp_make_init_ack(asoc, chunk, GFP_ATOMIC,
> - 0);
> - if (!new_obj)
> - goto nomem;
> -
> - sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY,
> - SCTP_CHUNK(new_obj));
> - break;
> -
> case SCTP_CMD_PEER_INIT:
> /* Process a unified INIT from the peer.
> * Note: Only used during INIT-ACK processing. If
> --
> 2.1.0
>
>
This is definately a valid cleanup, but I wonder if it wouldn't be better to,
instead of removing it, to use it. We have 2 locations where we actually call
sctp_make_init_ack, and then have to check the return code and abort the
operation if we get a NULL return. Would it be a better solution (in the sense
of keeping our control flow in line with how the rest of the state machine is
supposed to work), if we didn't just add a SCTP_CMD_GEN_INIT_ACK sideeffect to
the state machine queue in the locations where we otherwise would call
sctp_make_init_ack/sctp_add_cmd_sf(...SCTP_CMD_REPLY)?
Neil
