Sun, May 05, 2019 at 02:33:18AM CEST, sae...@mellanox.com wrote:
>From: Feras Daoud <fera...@mellanox.com>
>
>If a FW assert is considered fatal, indicated by a new bit in the health
>buffer, reset the FW. After the reset go through the normal recovery
>flow. Only one PF needs to issue the reset, so an attempt is made to
>prevent the 2nd function from also issuing the reset.
>It's not an error if that happens, it just slows recovery.
>
>Signed-off-by: Feras Daoud <fera...@mellanox.com>
>Signed-off-by: Alex Vesker <va...@mellanox.com>
>Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <mo...@mellanox.com>
>Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <dani...@mellanox.com>
>Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <sae...@mellanox.com>
>---
> .../ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/diag/crdump.c |  13 +-
> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/health.c  | 157 +++++++++++++++++-
> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c    |   1 +
> .../ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/mlx5_core.h   |   2 +
> include/linux/mlx5/device.h                   |  10 +-
> include/linux/mlx5/driver.h                   |   1 +
> 6 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>

[...]


>+void mlx5_error_sw_reset(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
>+{
>+      unsigned long end, delay_ms = MLX5_FW_RESET_WAIT_MS;
>+      int lock = -EBUSY;
>+
>+      mutex_lock(&dev->intf_state_mutex);
>+      if (dev->state != MLX5_DEVICE_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR)
>+              goto unlock;
>+
>+      mlx5_core_err(dev, "start\n");

Leftover?

Reply via email to