[PATCH net-next] bpf: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO in bpf_fd_sk_storage_update_elem()

[YueHaibing]

Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR

Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaib...@huawei.com>
---
 net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
index a8e9ac71b22d..cc9597a87770 100644
--- a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
+++ b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
@@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ static int bpf_fd_sk_storage_update_elem(struct bpf_map 
*map, void *key,
        if (sock) {
                sdata = sk_storage_update(sock->sk, map, value, map_flags);
                sockfd_put(sock);
-               return IS_ERR(sdata) ? PTR_ERR(sdata) : 0;
+               return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(sdata);
        }
 
        return err;