Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:28:06PM CET, mkube...@suse.cz wrote: >On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 02:09:28PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Could you please perhaps split the patchset so it contains max ~15 patches? > >Would 1-17 still be acceptable? The thing is that patch 16 is the first >where some "normal" notification (i.e. not EVENT one) is sent and >patch 17 is the first implementation of a request modifying data. >I believe having at least one example of both querying and setting data >would help the review discussion. > >Or perhaps I could leave GET_INFO related patches (at least second and >third) for later.
I think 17 is okay. Please split if possible. > >Michal
