Mar 24, 2019, 5:20 PM by dsah...@gmail.com:
> On 3/24/19 11:02 AM, > emersonbern...@tutanota.com > <mailto:emersonbern...@tutanota.com>> wrote: > >> Ok but previous versions of iproute2 didn't treat this as error and didn't >> exited with non-zero status. Is non existing default route a system error >> which needs fixing? >> > > The kernel is returning that error, not iproute2. > I mean that with older versions of iproute2 this error isn't shown for userspace. > It is the default *table*, not a default route. > True. Still the question remains: is non existing default table a system error which needs fixing?
