From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
Per listen(fd, backlog) rules, there is really no point accepting a SYN,
sending a SYNACK, and dropping the following ACK packet if accept queue
is full, because application is not draining accept queue fast enough.
This behavior is fooling TCP clients that believe they established a
flow, while there is nothing at server side. They might then send about
10 MSS (if using IW10) that will be dropped anyway while server is under
stress.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardw...@google.com>
Acked-by: Yuchung Cheng <ych...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
(cherry picked from commit 5ea8ea2cb7f1d0db15762c9b0bb9e7330425a071)
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
---
include/net/inet_connection_sock.h | 5 -----
net/dccp/ipv4.c | 8 +-------
net/dccp/ipv6.c | 2 +-
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 8 +-------
4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
b/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
index 49dcad4fe99e..72599bbc8255 100644
--- a/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
+++ b/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
@@ -289,11 +289,6 @@ static inline int inet_csk_reqsk_queue_len(const struct
sock *sk)
return reqsk_queue_len(&inet_csk(sk)->icsk_accept_queue);
}
-static inline int inet_csk_reqsk_queue_young(const struct sock *sk)
-{
- return reqsk_queue_len_young(&inet_csk(sk)->icsk_accept_queue);
-}
-
static inline int inet_csk_reqsk_queue_is_full(const struct sock *sk)
{
return inet_csk_reqsk_queue_len(sk) >= sk->sk_max_ack_backlog;
diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv4.c b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
index 45fd82e61e79..b0a577a79a6a 100644
--- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
@@ -592,13 +592,7 @@ int dccp_v4_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
*skb)
if (inet_csk_reqsk_queue_is_full(sk))
goto drop;
- /*
- * Accept backlog is full. If we have already queued enough
- * of warm entries in syn queue, drop request. It is better than
- * clogging syn queue with openreqs with exponentially increasing
- * timeout.
- */
- if (sk_acceptq_is_full(sk) && inet_csk_reqsk_queue_young(sk) > 1)
+ if (sk_acceptq_is_full(sk))
goto drop;
req = inet_reqsk_alloc(&dccp_request_sock_ops, sk, true);
diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv6.c b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
index 0bf41faeffc4..18bb2a42f0d1 100644
--- a/net/dccp/ipv6.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int dccp_v6_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct
sk_buff *skb)
if (inet_csk_reqsk_queue_is_full(sk))
goto drop;
- if (sk_acceptq_is_full(sk) && inet_csk_reqsk_queue_young(sk) > 1)
+ if (sk_acceptq_is_full(sk))
goto drop;
req = inet_reqsk_alloc(&dccp6_request_sock_ops, sk, true);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 1aff93d76f24..b320fa9f834a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -6305,13 +6305,7 @@ int tcp_conn_request(struct request_sock_ops *rsk_ops,
goto drop;
}
-
- /* Accept backlog is full. If we have already queued enough
- * of warm entries in syn queue, drop request. It is better than
- * clogging syn queue with openreqs with exponentially increasing
- * timeout.
- */
- if (sk_acceptq_is_full(sk) && inet_csk_reqsk_queue_young(sk) > 1) {
+ if (sk_acceptq_is_full(sk)) {
NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_LISTENOVERFLOWS);
goto drop;
}
--
2.20.0
