Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 08:19:00PM CET, jakub.kicin...@netronome.com wrote: >On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:21:05 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> >First two entries shows the link between hostport and switchport. >> >$ devlink port show >> >pci/0000:05:00.0/10002 eth netdev flavour switchport switch_id 00154d130d2f >> >peer pci/0000:05:00.0/1 >> > >> >pci/0000:05:00.0/1 eth netdev flavour hostport switch_id 00154d130d2f peer >> >pci/0000:05:00.0/10002 >> >> Hostport should not have switch_id. > >Isn't a concept of a port of a switch without a switch ID a red flag?
If we want to have hostports as devlink ports, they should not have switch id. They are not switch ports but rather counterparts of the switch ports.
