On 03/20/2019 08:39 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > I think you need to convince Dave and Eric that > above surgery is necessary to do the hack in patch 6 with > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sk_buff, bpf_flow_skb); > Yes, this is a huge code churn. Honestly I believe we are going too far in this series. > I think the better option it to introduce new prog type that works > without skb. I think it can be pretty close to shape and form to xdp. >
- [RFC bpf-next v2 0/9] net: flow_dissector: trigger BPF ... Stanislav Fomichev
- [RFC bpf-next v2 1/9] net: introduce __init_skb{,_... Stanislav Fomichev
- Re: [RFC bpf-next v2 1/9] net: introduce __ini... Alexei Starovoitov
- Re: [RFC bpf-next v2 1/9] net: introduce _... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [RFC bpf-next v2 1/9] net: introdu... Willem de Bruijn
- Re: [RFC bpf-next v2 1/9] net: in... Stanislav Fomichev
- Re: [RFC bpf-next v2 1/9] net... Alexei Starovoitov
- Re: [RFC bpf-next v2 1/9]... Willem de Bruijn
- Re: [RFC bpf-next v2 1/9]... Alexei Starovoitov
- Re: [RFC bpf-next v2 1/9]... Stanislav Fomichev
- [RFC bpf-next v2 2/9] net: introduce skb_net helpe... Stanislav Fomichev
- Re: [RFC bpf-next v2 2/9] net: introduce skb_n... Willem de Bruijn
- Re: [RFC bpf-next v2 2/9] net: introduce s... Stanislav Fomichev
- [RFC bpf-next v2 4/9] net: flow_dissector: prepare... Stanislav Fomichev