On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 15:55 +0000, Roi Dayan wrote:
> 
> On 04/03/2019 10:27, xiangxia.m....@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m....@gmail.com>
> > 
> > If we try to set VFs rate on a VF (not PF) net device, the kernel
> > will be crash. The commands are show as below:
> > 
> > $ echo 2 > /sys/class/net/$MLX_PF0/device/sriov_numvfs
> > $ ip link set $MLX_VF0 vf 0 max_tx_rate 2 min_tx_rate 1
> > 
> > If not applied the first patch ("net/mlx5: Avoid panic when setting
> > vport mac, getting vport config"), the command:
> > 
> > $ ip link set $MLX_VF0 vf 0 rate 100
> > 
> > can also crash the kernel.
> > 
> > [ 1650.006388] RIP: 0010:mlx5_eswitch_set_vport_rate+0x1f/0x260
> > [mlx5_core]
> > [ 1650.007092]  do_setlink+0x982/0xd20
> > [ 1650.007129]  __rtnl_newlink+0x528/0x7d0
> > [ 1650.007374]  rtnl_newlink+0x43/0x60
> > [ 1650.007407]  rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x2a2/0x320
> > [ 1650.007484]  netlink_rcv_skb+0xcb/0x100
> > [ 1650.007519]  netlink_unicast+0x17f/0x230
> > [ 1650.007554]  netlink_sendmsg+0x2d2/0x3d0
> > [ 1650.007592]  sock_sendmsg+0x36/0x50
> > [ 1650.007625]  ___sys_sendmsg+0x280/0x2a0
> > [ 1650.007963]  __sys_sendmsg+0x58/0xa0
> > [ 1650.007998]  do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180
> > [ 1650.009438]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> > 
> > Fixes: c9497c98901c ("net/mlx5: Add support for setting VF min
> > rate")
> > Cc: Mohamad Haj Yahia <moha...@mellanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m....@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > v1->v2: change commit log
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c | 13 +++++++++
> > ----
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
> > index 385e5cc..9e339b2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
> > @@ -2116,19 +2116,24 @@ static int normalize_vports_min_rate(struct
> > mlx5_eswitch *esw, u32 divider)
> >  int mlx5_eswitch_set_vport_rate(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, int
> > vport,
> >                             u32 max_rate, u32 min_rate)
> >  {
> > -   u32 fw_max_bw_share = MLX5_CAP_QOS(esw->dev,
> > max_tsar_bw_share);
> > -   bool min_rate_supported = MLX5_CAP_QOS(esw->dev, esw_bw_share)
> > &&
> > -                                   fw_max_bw_share >=
> > MLX5_MIN_BW_SHARE;
> > -   bool max_rate_supported = MLX5_CAP_QOS(esw->dev,
> > esw_rate_limit);
> >     struct mlx5_vport *evport;
> > +   u32 fw_max_bw_share;
> >     u32 previous_min_rate;
> >     u32 divider;
> > +   bool min_rate_supported;
> > +   bool max_rate_supported;
> >     int err = 0;
> >  
> >     if (!ESW_ALLOWED(esw))
> >             return -EPERM;
> >     if (!LEGAL_VPORT(esw, vport))
> >             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +   fw_max_bw_share = MLX5_CAP_QOS(esw->dev, max_tsar_bw_share);
> > +   min_rate_supported = MLX5_CAP_QOS(esw->dev, esw_bw_share) &&
> > +                           fw_max_bw_share >= MLX5_MIN_BW_SHARE;
> > +   max_rate_supported = MLX5_CAP_QOS(esw->dev, esw_rate_limit);
> > +
> >     if ((min_rate && !min_rate_supported) || (max_rate &&
> > !max_rate_supported))
> >             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >  
> > 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <r...@mellanox.com>

Acked-by: Saeed Mahameed <sae...@mellanox.com>

Reply via email to