Hi Vlad,
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:12:18 +0200
Vlad Buslov <[email protected]> wrote:
> -static bool __fl_delete(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct cls_fl_filter *f,
> - struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +static int __fl_delete(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct cls_fl_filter *f,
> + bool *last, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct cls_fl_head *head = fl_head_dereference(tp);
> bool async = tcf_exts_get_net(&f->exts);
> - bool last;
>
> + *last = false;
> +
> + if (f->deleted)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + f->deleted = true;
Now that I can read this more easily :) I have a doubt: you say this
flag "prevent[s] double deletion of filter by concurrent tasks".
However, if this has no further protections (which I can't readily
see), I think this is racy:
task 1 task 2
if (f->deleted) [false]
if (f->deleted) [false]
f->deleted = true; f->deleted = true;
what am I missing here?
--
Stefano