On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:10 PM Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Add two additional tests for further asserting the
> BPF_ALU_NON_POINTER logic with cases that were missed
> previously.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
> Cc: Marek Majkowski <[email protected]>
> Cc: Arthur Fabre <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c
> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c
> index 4b721a77bebb..c3de1a2c9dc5 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@
> .retval = 0,
> },
> {
> - "sanitation: alu with different scalars",
> + "sanitation: alu with different scalars 1",
> .insns = {
> BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
> BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_ARG1, 0),
> @@ -198,6 +198,48 @@
> .result = ACCEPT,
> .retval = 0x100000,
> },
> +{
> + "sanitation: alu with different scalars 2",
> + .insns = {
> + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
> + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
> + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
> + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_FP),
> + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -16),
> + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, -16, 0),
> + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem),
> + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
> + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
> + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_FP),
> + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -16),
> + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem),
> + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
> + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_6),
> + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_7),
> + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_8),
> + BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> + },
> + .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
> + .result = ACCEPT,
> + .retval = -EINVAL * 2,
Why "-EINVAL * 2" here?
> +},
> +{
> + "sanitation: alu with different scalars 3",
> + .insns = {
> + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, EINVAL),
> + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, BPF_REG_0, -1),
> + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
> + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, EINVAL),
> + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, BPF_REG_0, -1),
> + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
> + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_6),
> + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_7),
> + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_8),
> + BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> + },
> + .result = ACCEPT,
> + .retval = -EINVAL * 2,
> +},
> {
> "map access: value_ptr += known scalar, upper oob arith, test 1",
> .insns = {
> --
> 2.17.1
>
