On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 4:28 PM Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> wrote: > > On 03/01/2019 01:27 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > > On 02/28/2019 11:40 PM, Song Liu wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:59 AM Andrii Nakryiko <andr...@fb.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Fix few formatting errors. Fix few typos and reflow long descriptive > >>> comments for more even text fill. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andr...@fb.com> > >> > >> I think we should not change the code for formatting, as these changes make > >> git-blame more difficult. How about we only make changes to comments? > > > > Kind of true, though git blame is imho not too useful (unless I'm missing > > some git magic :)); git log -p has much more historical context to search > > through. I think these cleanups below are okay, though my worry is that > > for someone doing backports changes that are scattered like this mainly > > cause conflicts which then gets painful to resolve. I think we could make > > it work if they are split and more isolated, e.g. syscall ones could be > > one commit, another one only touching the big contiguous verifier comment, > > and so on. > > (Ideally also separate from the doc-only patches which is the rest of your > series.)
Yep, sure, I'll split this into two patchsets and this patch into multiple patches (as part of second patchset).
