Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 03:22:43PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.ten...@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c | 13 ++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c b/drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c
> > index e5d098bd33a6..765edd34a7dd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c
> > @@ -245,17 +245,8 @@ static int mv3310_probe(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int mv3310_suspend(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > -{
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int mv3310_resume(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > -{
> > - return mv3310_hwmon_config(phydev, true);
>
>
> I'm confused.
>
> Didn't patch 1 just add suspend and resume callback? And here you are
> removing some other suspend and resume callbacks? Did we have two sets
> for a short while?
Indeed. I just check and what happened is I initially had the
suspend/resume callbacks implementation and this patch into the same
patch. And then I made a mistake when splitting them, leaving two
suspend/resume functions, and I did not see that when reviewing the
series...
Sorry about that, I'll fix it!
Thanks,
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
