On 02/21/2019 08:11 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > Simple test that I used to reproduce the issue in the previous commit: > Do BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with max iterations, each program is 4096 simple > move instructions. File alarm in 0.1 second and check that > bpf_prog_test_run is interrupted (i.e. test doesn't hang). > > Note: reposting this for bpf-next to avoid linux-next conflict. In this > version I test both BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER (which uses generic > bpf_test_run implementation) and BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR (which has > it own loop with preempt handling in bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector). > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Applied, thanks!
