On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:34:57 +0100
Stefano Brivio <sbri...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:54:36 -0800
> Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
> > @@ -2224,13 +2223,15 @@ static int do_setvfinfo(struct net_device *dev,
> > struct nlattr **tb)
> >
> > len++;
> > }
> > - if (len == 0)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - err = ops->ndo_set_vf_vlan(dev, ivvl[0]->vf, ivvl[0]->vlan,
> > - ivvl[0]->qos, ivvl[0]->vlan_proto);
> > - if (err < 0)
> > - return err;
> > + err = -EINVAL; /* empty list error */
> > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> > + err = ops->ndo_set_vf_vlan(dev, ivvl[i]->vf,
> > + ivvl[i]->vlan, ivvl[i]->qos,
> > + ivvl[i]->vlan_proto);
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + return err;
> > + }
>
> I think the:
>
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
>
> should be outside the loop (with a "break;" inside), otherwise you won't
> return anymore if len == 0.
>
Your right with empty list it would fall through and look at other attributes
which could overwrite err.
