Hi Frank,
On 2/16/2019 8:22 AM, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i've found an oops in 4.19.23/10, seems to be fixed anyhow in 5.0 (also works
> in 4.14.101)
>
> root@bpi-r2:~# ip link add link lan0 name lan0.5 type vlan id 5
> root@bpi-r2:~# ip addr add 192.168.5.200/24 brd 192.168.5.255 dev lan0.5
> root@bpi-r2:~# ip link set dev lan0 up
> root@bpi-r2:~# ip link set dev lan0.5 up
So that these steps don't involve a bridge, and because we don't (yet)
implment ndo_vlan_rx_{add,kill}_vid() netdevice_ops, there is no VLAN
programming, it's all software
>
> 12: lan0.5@lan0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
> state LOWERLAYERDOWN group default qlen 1000
> link/ether 02:02:02:02:02:02 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet 192.168.5.200/24 brd 192.168.5.255 scope global lan0.5
> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>
> root@bpi-r2:~# brctl addbr bridge_name
> root@bpi-r2:~# brctl addif bridge_name lan0.5
Unless you changed the bridge to have VLAN filtering/awareness with:
echo 1 > /sys/class/net/bridge_name/bridge/vlan_filtering
There will be no VLAN configuration/objects pushed to DSA since commit
2ea7a679ca2abd251c1ec03f20508619707e1749 ("net: dsa: Don't add vlans
when vlan filtering is disabled") so I am not sure how you got into that
situation because prior to pushing a VLAN object, the port must be part
of a bridge, so the steps typically look like:
- port_bridge_join which assigns dp->bridge_dev
- port_vlan_add
Does your 4.19.23 kernel somehow change how VLAN objects are pushed down
the switch driver?
> [ 352.057128] bridge_name: port 1(lan0.5) entered blocking state
> [ 352.063065] bridge_name: port 1(lan0.5) entered disabled state
> [ 352.069181] device lan0.5 entered promiscuous mode
> [ 352.074018] device lan0 entered promiscuous mode
> [ 352.078906] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
> address 00000558
> ...
> [ 352.493085] [<bf0fde88>] (br_vlan_enabled [bridge]) from [<bf12c234>]
> (dsa_port_vlan_add+0x60/0xbc [dsa_core])
> [ 352.503050] [<bf12c234>] (dsa_port_vlan_add [dsa_core]) from [<bf12cb64>]
> (dsa_slave_port_obj_add+0x4c/0x50 [dsa_core])
> [ 352.513776] [<bf12cb64>] (dsa_slave_port_obj_add [dsa_core]) from
> [<c0b4e2d4>] (__switchdev_port_obj_add+0x50/0xc4)
> [ 352.524138] [<c0b4e2d4>] (__switchdev_port_obj_add) from [<c0b4e324>]
> (__switchdev_port_obj_add+0xa0/0xc4)
> [ 352.533721] [<c0b4e324>] (__switchdev_port_obj_add) from [<c0b4e3a8>]
> (switchdev_port_obj_add_now+0x60/0x130)
> [ 352.543562] [<c0b4e3a8>] (switchdev_port_obj_add_now) from [<c0b4e7e4>]
> (switchdev_port_obj_add+0x44/0x190)
> [ 352.553284] [<c0b4e7e4>] (switchdev_port_obj_add) from [<bf1013d0>]
> (br_switchdev_port_vlan_add+0x60/0x7c [bridge])
> [ 352.563733] [<bf1013d0>] (br_switchdev_port_vlan_add [bridge]) from
> [<bf0ff250>] (__vlan_add+0xb0/0x620 [bridge])
> [ 352.574007] [<bf0ff250>] (__vlan_add [bridge]) from [<bf0ffd04>]
> (nbp_vlan_add+0xc4/0x150 [bridge])
> [ 352.583073] [<bf0ffd04>] (nbp_vlan_add [bridge]) from [<bf0ffec4>]
> (nbp_vlan_init+0x134/0x164 [bridge])
> [ 352.592482] [<bf0ffec4>] (nbp_vlan_init [bridge]) from [<bf0edd4c>]
> (br_add_if+0x40c/0x5fc [bridge])
> [ 352.601632] [<bf0edd4c>] (br_add_if [bridge]) from [<bf0eeb14>]
> (add_del_if+0x6c/0x80 [bridge])
> [ 352.610351] [<bf0eeb14>] (add_del_if [bridge]) from [<bf0ef5b0>]
> (br_dev_ioctl+0x7c/0x9c [bridge])
> [ 352.619290] [<bf0ef5b0>] (br_dev_ioctl [bridge]) from [<c09583d4>]
> (dev_ifsioc+0x184/0x324)
> [ 352.627582] [<c09583d4>] (dev_ifsioc) from [<c09589e8>]
> (dev_ioctl+0x32c/0x5cc)
> [ 352.634837] [<c09589e8>] (dev_ioctl) from [<c090913c>]
> (sock_ioctl+0x3bc/0x580)
>
>
> since my 4.19.23 kernel is modified a bit i tried with 4.19.10 without my net
> modifications and it is still reproducable with steps above (create a vlan on
> dsa-user-port and then use it in a bridge)
>
> i fixed it with these changes:
>
> diff --git a/net/dsa/port.c b/net/dsa/port.c
> index ed0595459df1..962887752ae8 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/port.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/port.c
> @@ -255,8 +255,9 @@ int dsa_port_vlan_add(struct dsa_port *dp,
> if (netif_is_bridge_master(vlan->obj.orig_dev))
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> - if (br_vlan_enabled(dp->bridge_dev))
> - return dsa_port_notify(dp, DSA_NOTIFIER_VLAN_ADD, &info);
> + printk(KERN_ALERT "DEBUG: Passed %s %d 0x%x
> \n",__FUNCTION__,__LINE__,(unsigned int)dp->bridge_dev);
> + if (!dp->bridge_dev || br_vlan_enabled(dp->bridge_dev))
> + return dsa_port_notify(dp, DSA_NOTIFIER_VLAN_DEL, &info);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -273,7 +274,7 @@ int dsa_port_vlan_del(struct dsa_port *dp,
> if (netif_is_bridge_master(vlan->obj.orig_dev))
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> - if (br_vlan_enabled(dp->bridge_dev))
> + if (!dp->bridge_dev || br_vlan_enabled(dp->bridge_dev))
> return dsa_port_notify(dp, DSA_NOTIFIER_VLAN_DEL, &info);
>
> return 0;
>
> i've found in a Patch from florian/vivien:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg281415.html
>
> Strange that 5.0-rc1 does not crash,because these 2 code-sections are
> unchanged:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/net/dsa/port.c#n255
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/net/bridge/br_vlan.c#n788
>
> maybe you know why only 4.19 is affected...
>
> regards Frank
>
--
Florian
