On 2/15/19 9:51 AM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
> Lightweight tunnels are L3 constructs that are used with IP/IP6.
> 
> For example, lwtunnel_xmit is called from ip_output.c and
> ip6_output.c only.
> 
> Make the dependency explicit at least for LWT-BPF, as now they
> call into IP routing.
> 
> V2: added "Reported-by" below.
> 
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov <p...@google.com>

Yes, that works.  Thanks.

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org> # build-tested

> ---
>  net/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/Kconfig b/net/Kconfig
> index 5cb9de1aaf88..62da6148e9f8 100644
> --- a/net/Kconfig
> +++ b/net/Kconfig
> @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ config LWTUNNEL
>  
>  config LWTUNNEL_BPF
>       bool "Execute BPF program as route nexthop action"
> -     depends on LWTUNNEL
> +     depends on LWTUNNEL && INET
>       default y if LWTUNNEL=y
>       ---help---
>         Allows to run BPF programs as a nexthop action following a route
> 


-- 
~Randy

Reply via email to