A /0 subnet mask is theoretically valid, but ip route get doesn't allow
it:
$ ip route get 1.0.0.0/0
need at least a destination address
Change the check and remember whether we found an address or not, since
according to the documentation it's a mandatory parameter.
$ ip/ip route get 1.0.0.0/0
1.0.0.0 via 192.168.1.1 dev eth0 src 192.168.1.91 uid 1000
cache
Reported-by: Clément Hertling <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <[email protected]>
---
v2: changed the check instead of removing it, so that "ip route get"
fails since the address is a mandatory parameter according to the
manpage.
ip/iproute.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ip/iproute.c b/ip/iproute.c
index 5f58a3b3..cc02a3e1 100644
--- a/ip/iproute.c
+++ b/ip/iproute.c
@@ -1932,6 +1932,7 @@ static int iproute_get(int argc, char **argv)
int fib_match = 0;
int from_ok = 0;
unsigned int mark = 0;
+ bool address_found = false;
iproute_reset_filter(0);
filter.cloned = 2;
@@ -2037,11 +2038,12 @@ static int iproute_get(int argc, char **argv)
addattr_l(&req.n, sizeof(req),
RTA_DST, &addr.data, addr.bytelen);
req.r.rtm_dst_len = addr.bitlen;
+ address_found = true;
}
argc--; argv++;
}
- if (req.r.rtm_dst_len == 0) {
+ if (!address_found) {
fprintf(stderr, "need at least a destination address\n");
return -1;
}
--
2.20.1
