Hi all,

On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:13:25 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> 
wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   net/sched/cls_tcindex.c
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   8015d93ebd27 ("net_sched: fix a race condition in tcindex_destroy()")
>   033b228e7f26 ("net_sched: fix a memory leak in cls_tcindex")
> 
> from the net tree and commit:
> 
>   12db03b65c2b ("net: sched: extend proto ops to support unlocked 
> classifiers")
> 
> from the net-next tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see the final resolution when linux-next is published)
> and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
> linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be
> mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

Actually, see the below resolution.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc net/sched/cls_tcindex.c
index 38bb882bb958,14d6b4058045..e6cf20bc8e80
--- a/net/sched/cls_tcindex.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_tcindex.c
@@@ -559,34 -563,15 +560,34 @@@ static void tcindex_destroy(struct tcf_
                            struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
  {
        struct tcindex_data *p = rtnl_dereference(tp->root);
 -      struct tcf_walker walker;
 +      int i;
  
        pr_debug("tcindex_destroy(tp %p),p %p\n", tp, p);
 -      walker.count = 0;
 -      walker.skip = 0;
 -      walker.fn = tcindex_destroy_element;
 -      tcindex_walk(tp, &walker, true);
  
 -      call_rcu(&p->rcu, __tcindex_destroy);
 +      if (p->perfect) {
 +              for (i = 0; i < p->hash; i++) {
 +                      struct tcindex_filter_result *r = p->perfect + i;
 +
 +                      tcf_unbind_filter(tp, &r->res);
 +                      if (tcf_exts_get_net(&r->exts))
 +                              tcf_queue_work(&r->rwork,
 +                                             tcindex_destroy_rexts_work);
 +                      else
 +                              __tcindex_destroy_rexts(r);
 +              }
 +      }
 +
 +      for (i = 0; p->h && i < p->hash; i++) {
 +              struct tcindex_filter *f, *next;
 +              bool last;
 +
 +              for (f = rtnl_dereference(p->h[i]); f; f = next) {
 +                      next = rtnl_dereference(f->next);
-                       tcindex_delete(tp, &f->result, &last, NULL);
++                      tcindex_delete(tp, &f->result, &last, false, NULL);
 +              }
 +      }
 +
 +      tcf_queue_work(&p->rwork, tcindex_destroy_work);
  }
  
  

Attachment: pgpNyus1SwOgo.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to