From: Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de>
Sander Eikelenboom bisected a NAT related regression down
to the l4proto->manip_pkt indirection removal.
I forgot that ICMP(v6) errors (e.g. PKTTOOBIG) can be set as related
to the existing conntrack entry.
Therefore, when passing the skb to nf_nat_ipv4/6_manip_pkt(), that
ended up calling the wrong l4 manip function, as tuple->dst.protonum
is the original flows l4 protocol (TCP, UDP, etc).
Set the dst protocol field to ICMP(v6), we already have a private copy
of the tuple due to the inversion of src/dst.
Reported-by: Sander Eikelenboom <li...@eikelenboom.it>
Tested-by: Sander Eikelenboom <li...@eikelenboom.it>
Fixes: faec18dbb0405 ("netfilter: nat: remove l4proto->manip_pkt")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pa...@netfilter.org>
---
net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c | 1 +
net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c
b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c
index 2687db015b6f..fa2ba7c500e4 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c
@@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ int nf_nat_icmp_reply_translation(struct sk_buff *skb,
/* Change outer to look like the reply to an incoming packet */
nf_ct_invert_tuplepr(&target, &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple);
+ target.dst.protonum = IPPROTO_ICMP;
if (!nf_nat_ipv4_manip_pkt(skb, 0, &target, manip))
return 0;
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
index 23022447eb49..7a41ee3c11b4 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
@@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ int nf_nat_icmpv6_reply_translation(struct sk_buff *skb,
}
nf_ct_invert_tuplepr(&target, &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple);
+ target.dst.protonum = IPPROTO_ICMPV6;
if (!nf_nat_ipv6_manip_pkt(skb, 0, &target, manip))
return 0;
--
2.11.0
