On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 10:01:10AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Eli Cohen <e...@mellanox.com> > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 09:45:49 +0200 > > > diff --git a/net/sched/act_simple.c b/net/sched/act_simple.c > > index 902957beceb3..d54cb608dbaf 100644 > > --- a/net/sched/act_simple.c > > +++ b/net/sched/act_simple.c > > @@ -19,8 +19,6 @@ > > #include <net/netlink.h> > > #include <net/pkt_sched.h> > > > > -#define TCA_ACT_SIMP 22 > > - > > #include <linux/tc_act/tc_defact.h> > > #include <net/tc_act/tc_defact.h> > > > > I would do this in patch #1.
Sure, that was the intention. It just slipped off my fingers. Will fix and send a new series. > Actually, because you didn't, after patch #1 there are two #defines > evaluated for this macro. One in pkt_cls.h and one here. > > The only reason the compiler doesn't warn and complain is because the > definitions are identical. > > Thank you.