On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 10:01:10AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eli Cohen <e...@mellanox.com>
> Date: Thu,  7 Feb 2019 09:45:49 +0200
> 
> > diff --git a/net/sched/act_simple.c b/net/sched/act_simple.c
> > index 902957beceb3..d54cb608dbaf 100644
> > --- a/net/sched/act_simple.c
> > +++ b/net/sched/act_simple.c
> > @@ -19,8 +19,6 @@
> >  #include <net/netlink.h>
> >  #include <net/pkt_sched.h>
> >  
> > -#define TCA_ACT_SIMP 22
> > -
> >  #include <linux/tc_act/tc_defact.h>
> >  #include <net/tc_act/tc_defact.h>
> >  
> 
> I would do this in patch #1.

Sure, that was the intention. It just slipped off my fingers.

Will fix and send a new series.

> Actually, because you didn't, after patch #1 there are two #defines
> evaluated for this macro.  One in pkt_cls.h and one here.
> 
> The only reason the compiler doesn't warn and complain is because the
> definitions are identical.
> 
> Thank you.

Reply via email to