Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 04:16:10AM CET, jakub.kicin...@netronome.com wrote: >Vendor may sound ambiguous, let's rename the fab string to >"board.manufacture". > >Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicin...@netronome.com> >Reviewed-by: Dirk van der Merwe <dirk.vanderme...@netronome.com> >--- > drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c >b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c >index dddbb0575be9..6e15e216732a 100644 >--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c >+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c >@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static const struct nfp_devlink_versions_simple { > } nfp_devlink_versions_hwinfo[] = { > { DEVLINK_INFO_VERSION_GENERIC_BOARD_ID, "assembly.partno", }, > { DEVLINK_INFO_VERSION_GENERIC_BOARD_REV, "assembly.revision", }, >- { "board.vendor", /* fab */ "assembly.vendor", }, >+ { "board.manufacture", "assembly.vendor", },
I wonder, why this is not among generic? > { "board.model", /* code name */ "assembly.model", }, > }; > >-- >2.19.2 >