Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 04:16:10AM CET, jakub.kicin...@netronome.com wrote:
>Vendor may sound ambiguous, let's rename the fab string to
>"board.manufacture".
>
>Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicin...@netronome.com>
>Reviewed-by: Dirk van der Merwe <dirk.vanderme...@netronome.com>
>---
> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c 
>b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c
>index dddbb0575be9..6e15e216732a 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c
>@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static const struct nfp_devlink_versions_simple {
> } nfp_devlink_versions_hwinfo[] = {
>       { DEVLINK_INFO_VERSION_GENERIC_BOARD_ID,        "assembly.partno", },
>       { DEVLINK_INFO_VERSION_GENERIC_BOARD_REV,       "assembly.revision", },
>-      { "board.vendor", /* fab */                     "assembly.vendor", },
>+      { "board.manufacture",                          "assembly.vendor", },

I wonder, why this is not among generic?


>       { "board.model", /* code name */                "assembly.model", },
> };
> 
>-- 
>2.19.2
>

Reply via email to