Hi Matthew, On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 07:07:45AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 04:36:36PM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > > +/* Until we can update struct-page, have a shadow struct-page, that > > + * include our use-case > > + * Used to store retrieve dma addresses from network drivers. > > + * Never access this directly, use helper functions provided > > + * page_pool_get_dma_addr() > > + */ > > Huh? Why not simply: > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h > index 2c471a2c43fa..2495a93ad90c 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h > +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h > @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ struct address_space; > struct mem_cgroup; > struct hmm; > > +struct page_pool { > + dma_addr_t dma_addr; > +}; > + > /* > * Each physical page in the system has a struct page associated with > * it to keep track of whatever it is we are using the page for at the > @@ -77,6 +81,7 @@ struct page { > * avoid collision and false-positive PageTail(). > */ > union { > + struct page_pool pool; > struct { /* Page cache and anonymous pages */ > /** > * @lru: Pageout list, eg. active_list protected by >
Well updating struct page is the final goal, hence the comment. I am mostly looking for opinions here since we are trying to store dma addresses which are irrelevant to pages. Having dma_addr_t definitions in mm-related headers is a bit controversial isn't it ? If we can add that, then yes the code would look better Thanks /Ilias