From: Karsten Graul <kgr...@linux.ibm.com>

The lgr field of an smc_connection is set in smc_conn_create() and
should be cleared in smc_conn_free() for consistency reasons, so move
the responsible code.

Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgr...@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubr...@linux.ibm.com>
---
 net/smc/smc_core.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
index 35c1cdc93e1c..a1a6d351ae1b 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
@@ -118,7 +118,6 @@ static void __smc_lgr_unregister_conn(struct smc_connection 
*conn)
        rb_erase(&conn->alert_node, &lgr->conns_all);
        lgr->conns_num--;
        conn->alert_token_local = 0;
-       conn->lgr = NULL;
        sock_put(&smc->sk); /* sock_hold in smc_lgr_register_conn() */
 }
 
@@ -331,8 +330,9 @@ void smc_conn_free(struct smc_connection *conn)
        } else {
                smc_cdc_tx_dismiss_slots(conn);
        }
-       smc_lgr_unregister_conn(conn);          /* unsets conn->lgr */
+       smc_lgr_unregister_conn(conn);
        smc_buf_unuse(conn, lgr);               /* allow buffer reuse */
+       conn->lgr = NULL;
 
        if (!lgr->conns_num)
                smc_lgr_schedule_free_work(lgr);
@@ -462,6 +462,7 @@ static void __smc_lgr_terminate(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
                sock_hold(&smc->sk); /* sock_put in close work */
                conn->local_tx_ctrl.conn_state_flags.peer_conn_abort = 1;
                __smc_lgr_unregister_conn(conn);
+               conn->lgr = NULL;
                write_unlock_bh(&lgr->conns_lock);
                if (!schedule_work(&conn->close_work))
                        sock_put(&smc->sk);
-- 
2.16.4

Reply via email to