On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 20.24.10 CET Linus Lüssing wrote: [...] > Another thought, if all this is too vague for now...
Yes, it is to vague for the integration in netlink :D
> what about
> ommiting the BATADV_ATTR_MULTICAST_(MODE)_ENABLED for now and use
> a reverse logic instead? Like
> BATADV_ATTR_MULTICAST_FORCEFLOOD_ENABLED, defaulting to false.
Would be fine for me. But it is rather odd to map this to the batctl
multicast_mode. But the name is explaining quite well what it does
and you can later rewrite the batctl part.
Kind regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
