Heiko Carstens writes:

> Commit 626a5f66da0d19 ("s390: bpf: implement jitting of JMP32") added
> JMP32 code-gen support for s390. However it triggers the warning below
> due to some unusual gotos in the original s390 bpf jit code.
>
> Add a couple of additional "is_jmp32" initializations to fix this.
> Also fix the wrong opcode for the "llilf" instruction that was
> introduced with the same commit.
>
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function 'bpf_jit_insn':
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:248:55: warning: 'is_jmp32' may be used 
> uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>   _EMIT6(op1 | reg(b1, b2) << 16 | (rel & 0xffff), op2 | mask); \
>                                                        ^
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:1211:8: note: 'is_jmp32' was declared here
>    bool is_jmp32 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP32;
>
> Fixes: 626a5f66da0d19 ("s390: bpf: implement jitting of JMP32")
> Cc: Jiong Wang <jiong.w...@netronome.com>
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidef...@de.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com>

Thanks for fixing this.

Acked-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.w...@netronome.com>

Regards,
Jiong

> ---
>  arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index ce9defdff62a..51dd0267d014 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -1154,7 +1154,7 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, 
> struct bpf_prog *fp, int i
>               mask = 0x7000; /* jnz */
>               if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP32) {
>                       /* llilf %w1,imm (load zero extend imm) */
> -                     EMIT6_IMM(0xc0010000, REG_W1, imm);
> +                     EMIT6_IMM(0xc00f0000, REG_W1, imm);
>                       /* nr %w1,%dst */
>                       EMIT2(0x1400, REG_W1, dst_reg);
>               } else {
> @@ -1216,6 +1216,7 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, 
> struct bpf_prog *fp, int i
>                         REG_W1, dst_reg, src_reg);
>               goto branch_oc;
>  branch_ks:
> +             is_jmp32 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP32;
>               /* lgfi %w1,imm (load sign extend imm) */
>               EMIT6_IMM(0xc0010000, REG_W1, imm);
>               /* crj or cgrj %dst,%w1,mask,off */
> @@ -1223,6 +1224,7 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, 
> struct bpf_prog *fp, int i
>                           dst_reg, REG_W1, i, off, mask);
>               break;
>  branch_ku:
> +             is_jmp32 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP32;
>               /* lgfi %w1,imm (load sign extend imm) */
>               EMIT6_IMM(0xc0010000, REG_W1, imm);
>               /* clrj or clgrj %dst,%w1,mask,off */
> @@ -1230,11 +1232,13 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, 
> struct bpf_prog *fp, int i
>                           dst_reg, REG_W1, i, off, mask);
>               break;
>  branch_xs:
> +             is_jmp32 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP32;
>               /* crj or cgrj %dst,%src,mask,off */
>               EMIT6_PCREL(0xec000000, (is_jmp32 ? 0x0076 : 0x0064),
>                           dst_reg, src_reg, i, off, mask);
>               break;
>  branch_xu:
> +             is_jmp32 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP32;
>               /* clrj or clgrj %dst,%src,mask,off */
>               EMIT6_PCREL(0xec000000, (is_jmp32 ? 0x0077 : 0x0065),
>                           dst_reg, src_reg, i, off, mask);

Reply via email to