From: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
This function was modeled on the 'exact' insert one, which did not use
the rcu variant either.
When I fixed the 'exact' insert I forgot to propagate this to my
development tree, so the inexact variant retained the bug.
Fixes: 9cf545ebd591d ("xfrm: policy: store inexact policies in a tree ordered
by destination address")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <[email protected]>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 934492bad8e0..628b389af2ba 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -856,9 +856,9 @@ static void xfrm_policy_inexact_list_reinsert(struct net
*net,
}
if (newpos)
- hlist_add_behind(&policy->bydst, newpos);
+ hlist_add_behind_rcu(&policy->bydst, newpos);
else
- hlist_add_head(&policy->bydst, &n->hhead);
+ hlist_add_head_rcu(&policy->bydst, &n->hhead);
/* paranoia checks follow.
* Check that the reinserted policy matches at least
--
2.17.1