> > The function dsa_port_fixed_link_register_of creates this phy device,
> > adjusts the link and then calls put_device(&phydev->mdio.dev);
> > Does this mean that the phy device is immediately destroyed?
>
> Yes, we should actually migrate that code over to PHYLINK, because in
> PHYLINK the fixed links don't require creating a phy_device instance.
> This is something that has a potential of breaking a lot of people, so I
> have not really started doing it just yet :)
Hi Florian
It also has the advantage of being easier to implement. In order to
support 2.5G, i think we need C45 support, etc in the simulator.
Avoiding that would be nice.
Andrew
