> This is a lot of code change. This would do.
> 
> @@ -2434,8 +2434,6 @@ static inline void
> skb_probe_transport_header(struct sk_buff *skb,
> 
>         if (skb_flow_dissect_flow_keys_basic(skb, &keys, NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0))
>                 skb_set_transport_header(skb, keys.control.thoff);
> -       else
> -               skb_set_transport_header(skb, offset_hint);
>  }
> 
> Though leaving an unused argument is a bit ugly. For net-next, indeed
> better to clean up (please mark your patchset with net or net-next,
> btw)

It's for net-next (I'll resend with the correct mark), so I'll stick
with the current implementation.

> > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-
> netback/netback.c
> > index 80aae3a32c2a..b49b6e56ca47 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> > @@ -1105,6 +1105,7 @@ static int xenvif_tx_submit(struct xenvif_queue
> *queue)
> >                 struct xen_netif_tx_request *txp;
> >                 u16 pending_idx;
> >                 unsigned data_len;
> > +               bool th_set;
> >
> >                 pending_idx = XENVIF_TX_CB(skb)->pending_idx;
> >                 txp = &queue->pending_tx_info[pending_idx].req;
> > @@ -1169,20 +1170,22 @@ static int xenvif_tx_submit(struct xenvif_queue
> *queue)
> >                         continue;
> >                 }
> >
> > -               skb_probe_transport_header(skb, 0);
> > +               th_set = skb_try_probe_transport_header(skb);
> 
> Can use skb_transport_header_was_set(). Then at least there is no need
> to change the function's return value.

I suppose this comment relates to the previous one, and if we do it for
net-next, it's fine to make change I made, isn't it?

Thanks for reviewing.

Reply via email to