On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 5:34 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 05:14:54PM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > From: Willem de Bruijn <will...@google.com> > > > > Virtio-net devices negotiate LRO support with the host. > > Display the initially negotiated state with ethtool -k. > > > > Also allow configuring it with ethtool -K, reusing the existing > > virtnet_set_guest_offloads helper that configures LRO for XDP. > > This is conditional on VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS. > > > > Virtio-net negotiates TSO4 and TSO6 separately, but ethtool does not > > distinguish between the two. Display LRO as on only if any offload > > is active. > > > > RTNL is held while calling virtnet_set_features, same as on the path > > from virtnet_xdp_set. > > > > Changes v1 -> v2 > > - allow ethtool config (-K) only if VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS > > - show LRO as enabled if any LRO variant is enabled > > - do not allow configuration while XDP is active > > - differentiate current features from the capable set, to restore > > on XDP down only those features that were active on XDP up > > - move test out of VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM/TSO branch, which is tx only > > This part shouldn't be in the commit log, right? Should be after "---".
I believe that David prefers to have this recorded, so that anyone stumbling on the patch later (e.g., through git blame) understands why we made certain choices. > > Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <will...@google.com> > > Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> Thanks for the super fast review!