On 12/19/2018 06:22 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2018-12-19 17:15:32, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 05:08:57PM CET, pa...@denx.de wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>>> +static int ksz_i2c_write32(struct ksz_device *dev, u32 reg, u32 value)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + value = cpu_to_be32(value);
>>>>> + return ksz_i2c_write(dev, reg, &value, 4);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static int ksz_i2c_get(struct ksz_device *dev, u32 reg, void *data, 
>>>>> size_t len)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + return ksz_i2c_read(dev, reg, data, len);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static int ksz_i2c_set(struct ksz_device *dev, u32 reg, void *data, 
>>>>> size_t len)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + return ksz_i2c_write(dev, reg, data, len);
>>>>> +}
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This header file makes no sense. Please move the functions into .c
>>>
>>> No, that would make code bigger & slower.
>>>
>>> It makes sense to me. But I'd add "inline" keyword to make the goal
>>> explicit.
>>
>> 1) It makes no sense to have header files for things like this. The
>>    functions are only used within the single .c file.
>>
>> 2) You cannot inline them, as they are used as ops.
> 
> Ok, sorry for the noise.

If you were to use regmap, this whole boilerplate would go away ...

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

Reply via email to